FlowX.AI Documentation Style Guide
A comprehensive guide for writing, structuring, and maintaining FlowX.AI documentation.Table of contents
- Philosophy & principles
- Audience
- Voice & tone
- Writing guidelines
- Content types
- Structure patterns
- Formatting reference
- Quality checklist
Philosophy & principles
Core principle: Solve a need, not check a box
Every piece of documentation must answer: “What problem does this solve for the reader?” Avoid “documentation theater” — writing docs just because they’re expected. If you can’t identify the user need, question whether the doc should exist.Hierarchy of priorities
Focus efforts in this order:- Coverage — Document ~80% of capabilities (complete coverage is impossible)
- Usefulness — Does it solve problems and reduce friction?
- Freshness — Is it current and accurate?
- Discoverability — Can users find it when needed?
- Aesthetics — Visual polish (last priority, not first)
Minimum Viable Documentation (MVD)
- Ship “good enough” docs early
- Iterate based on feedback
- Something useful > something perfect but delayed
- Accept imperfection — docs can never be perfect
The invisibility goal
The best documentation doesn’t draw attention to itself. Users should solve their problem and move on, not remember the docs — just the success.Audience
Primary audiences
| Audience | Technical level | Goals |
|---|---|---|
| Platform administrators | High | Configure, deploy, maintain FlowX |
| Process designers | Medium | Build workflows, configure UI |
| Developers | High | Integrate APIs, customize renderers |
| Business analysts | Low-Medium | Understand capabilities, design processes |
Writing for your audience
- Don’t assume shared mental models — explain context
- Qualify complexity by experience level — “If you’re familiar with Kafka…”
- Avoid “easy” or “just” — what’s easy for you may not be for them
- Include prerequisites — help readers self-assess if content is for them
Voice & tone
Voice characteristics
| Do | Don’t |
|---|---|
| Direct and clear | Verbose or flowery |
| Confident but not arrogant | Condescending |
| Helpful and supportive | Dismissive of user struggles |
| Professional | Overly casual or stiff |
Tone by context
| Context | Tone |
|---|---|
| Tutorials/Getting started | Encouraging, patient |
| Reference docs | Precise, neutral |
| Troubleshooting | Empathetic, solution-focused |
| Release notes | Informative, concise |
| Warnings | Serious but not alarming |
Active voice
Use active voice. It’s clearer and more direct.Second person
Address the reader directly as “you.”Writing guidelines
Sentence structure
- Keep sentences short — aim for 15-25 words
- One idea per sentence
- Lead with the action in procedural content
- Front-load important information
Paragraph structure
- One topic per paragraph
- 2-4 sentences per paragraph for readability
- Use the inverted pyramid — most important info first
Lists
Use lists when you have:- 3+ related items
- Sequential steps
- Options or alternatives
Clarity techniques
| Technique | Example |
|---|---|
| Specific over vague | ”within 30 seconds” not “quickly” |
| Concrete over abstract | ”click Save” not “persist your changes” |
| Simple words | ”use” not “utilize”, “start” not “initiate” |
| Consistent terminology | Pick one term and stick with it |
What to avoid
- Jargon without explanation — define terms on first use
- Passive voice — unless the actor is unknown/irrelevant
- Future tense — use present tense for features that exist
- Marketing language — “revolutionary”, “seamless”, “best-in-class”
- Humor — it doesn’t translate well and ages poorly
- Absolutes — “always”, “never” (unless truly absolute)
Content types
Decision matrix: What to write
| User need | Content type |
|---|---|
| ”What is this?” | Overview / Concept doc |
| ”How do I start?” | Getting Started guide |
| ”How do I do X?” | Tutorial / How-to |
| ”What are the options?” | Reference doc |
| ”Why isn’t it working?” | Troubleshooting |
| ”What changed?” | Release notes |
| ”What’s recommended?” | Best practices |
Content type definitions
Overview / Concept
- Purpose: Explain what something is and why it matters
- Length: 200-500 words
- Include: Definition, use cases, key benefits, diagram
- Avoid: Step-by-step instructions (link to tutorials instead)
Getting Started
- Purpose: First successful experience with a feature
- Target: Completable in 5-15 minutes
- Include: Prerequisites, minimal steps, success validation
- Principles:
- End-to-end workflow, simplest possible output
- Minimize setup friction (sandboxes, sample data)
- Include troubleshooting for common first-time errors
- Teach concepts while doing
Tutorial / How-to
- Purpose: Guide through a specific task
- Structure: Prerequisites → Steps → Validation → Next steps
- Include: Code samples, screenshots at decision points
- Principles:
- One task per tutorial
- Test every step yourself
- Include expected output at key steps
Reference
- Purpose: Comprehensive details for lookup
- Structure: Organized for scanning (tables, lists)
- Include: All parameters, options, defaults, constraints
- Principles:
- Complete > concise
- Consistent structure across all reference docs
- Group logically (by function, not alphabetically)
Troubleshooting
- Purpose: Help users recover from problems
- Structure: Symptom → Cause → Solution
- Include: Error messages (exact text), diagnostic steps
- Principles:
- Lead with the symptom (what user sees)
- Actionable solutions, not just explanations
- Test solutions work
Release notes
- Purpose: Communicate changes between versions
- Include: New features, improvements, bug fixes, breaking changes
- Principles:
- User-facing changes only (not internal refactoring)
- Link to detailed docs, don’t repeat them
- Clear upgrade path for breaking changes
Best practices
- Purpose: Guidance for optimal usage
- Include: Recommendations, rationale, examples
- Principles:
- Explain why, not just what
- Based on real-world usage patterns
- Update as product evolves
Structure patterns
API/Integration documentation
Every API endpoint needs these 5 sections:- Resource description — What it does, when to use it
- Endpoint and method —
GET /api/v1/processes - Parameters — All params with type, required/optional, defaults
- Request example — Working curl or code sample
- Response example — Typical response with schema
Conceptual topics for APIs
Include these supporting docs:- Product overview
- Getting started (5-15 min)
- Authentication & authorization
- Status & error codes (standalone page)
- Rate limiting (if applicable)
- Quick reference / cheat sheet
- Glossary
- Best practices
Error code documentation
- Create a standalone page for all error codes
- Focus on custom codes specific to FlowX (standard HTTP codes need less explanation)
- Include recovery actions — not just definitions
- Test by breaking things — intentionally trigger errors to document them
Parameter documentation
For each parameter, document:- Data type (string, integer, boolean, object, array)
- Required or optional
- Default value
- Allowed values / constraints
- Example value
- Path parameters
- Query parameters
- Header parameters
- Request body
Setup guide structure
Formatting reference
See CLAUDE.md for complete Mintlify component reference.
Quick reference
| Element | Format |
|---|---|
| UI buttons/tabs | Bold: Click Save |
| Menu paths | Arrows: Settings → Access |
| Code/values | Backticks: value |
| File paths | Backticks: /config/application.yaml |
| Env variables | Backticks: REDIS_HOST |
| Placeholders | Curly braces: {your-api-key} |
| Keyboard shortcuts | Plus sign: Ctrl+S |
Terminology standards
| Use | Don’t use |
|---|---|
| app | application |
| turn on/off | enable/disable |
| set up (verb) | setup (as verb) |
| log in (verb) | login (as verb) |
| API | api, Api |
Headings
- Sentence case: “Configure the database connection”
- No period at end
- Front-load keywords for scanning
- Use parallel structure in lists of headings
Quality checklist
Before writing
- Identified the user need this doc solves
- Checked for existing docs on this topic
- Determined the right content type
- Identified target audience
While writing
- Used active voice
- Addressed reader as “you”
- Kept sentences under 25 words
- Included examples for complex concepts
- Tested all code samples and procedures
- Added screenshots at decision points (not every step)
Before publishing
- Spell-checked and grammar-checked
- Verified all links work
- Added to
docs.jsonnavigation - Wrapped images in
<Frame> - Included frontmatter (title, description)
- Added version callout if feature is version-specific
- Cross-linked to related docs
Content quality
- Answers “what problem does this solve?”
- Completable in reasonable time (Getting Started: 5-15 min)
- No “documentation theater” — genuinely useful
- No marketing language
- Accurate and testable
Accessibility
- Images have alt text
- Tables have headers
- Color is not the only indicator
- Code blocks have language specified
Maintenance
When to update docs
- New feature released
- Feature behavior changed
- User feedback indicates confusion
- Support tickets show recurring questions
- API endpoints modified
Docs observability
Track documentation effectiveness through:- User journey from docs → product success
- Support ticket reduction after doc updates
- Time to first successful API call
- Feedback and ratings (if available)
Deprecation
When removing or replacing content:- Add deprecation notice with alternative
- Keep old content accessible for transition period
- Update all internal links
- Remove from navigation after transition
Resources
External style guides for reference
- Google Developer Documentation Style Guide
- Microsoft Writing Style Guide
- Mailchimp Content Style Guide
Recommended reading
- I’d Rather Be Writing — API documentation best practices
- passo.uno — Technical writing strategy and AI integration
Last updated: February 2026

